M/S NORTH EAST PROPACK v. MRS GEETIKA BAROOAH CHANGKAKOTI
Crl.Rev.P./251/2011 · 2025-01-27
Arun Dev Choudhury
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18487 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18487 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010194192011
2025:GAU-AS:907
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Rev.P./251/2011 M/S NORTH EAST PROPACK A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT BANCO BUILDING, OPPOSITE AXIS BANK, GROUND FLOOR, A.T. ROAD, FANCY BAZAR, P.O. GUWAHATI, DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM, REPRESENTED BY SRI RAKESH BAID, SON OF SRI RAMESH KUMAR BAID, ONEOF THE PARTNERS OF THE PETITIONER FIRM. VERSUS MRS GEETIKA BAROOAH CHANGKAKOTI WIFE OF SRI TRIDEAB CHANGKAKOTI, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 16, BYE LANE NO. 7, RUKMINIGAON, GUWAHATI-781022 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.J BHATI, MR.T C DAS,MR.O P BHATI,MR.H K BORA Advocate for the Respondent : MS.D P HAZARIKA, MR.D BARUAH,MR.K GOSWAMI,MR K SAHARIA
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER 28.01.2025
Mr. P. Sarma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. O. P. Bhati, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that they have instruction from their client not to
Page No.# 2/2 press this present criminal revision petition. Accordingly, he seeks to withdraw this petition. Such prayer is not objected by Ms. B. Poddar, learned counsel for the respondent. In view of the aforesaid, this criminal revision petition stands dismissed on withdrawal. Interim order if any stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant