Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 184851 (ALL)

DEEPAK VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. LKO.

BAIL/1250/2025 · 2025-11-03

Pankaj Bhatia

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1250 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State. Whereas, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the informant despite notice. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.213 of 2023 under Sections 302, 201, 120B, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, P.S.- Chinhat, District- Lucknow. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the co-accused, namely, Abhishek Shukla has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 30.10.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.2440 of 2025. Therefore, applicant is also entitled to be released on bail. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering and adopting the reasoning as contained in para 3 & 5 of the order dated 30.10.2025, ground of parity, coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since 01.10.2024 and has criminal antecedent of one case, in which, he is on bail, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant- Deepak Verma be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kamlesh Singh, Harpreet Singh, Himadri Goswami, Kapil Kumar Yadav, Kaushal Kishore Tewari, Manjusha Kapil, Piyush Pathak, Praveen Kumar Yadav, Shashvat Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Deepak Verma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 3, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 1250 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench