JEET LAL VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO
BAIL/6607/2024 · 2025-11-07
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184847 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184847 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6607 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and Sri Brijesh Kumar Yadav, learned Counsel for the complainant. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.486 of 2023, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 323, 325, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Dehat, District Sultanpur. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that all the accused hurling abuses and were armed with Lathi, Danda, Axe etc. and caused injuries to the son of the son of the informant, because of which, he died. The cause of death, as per the postmortem report, ante mortem injury. Two contusions were visible on the body of the deceased. The applicant is around 60 years of age. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the fact that general allegations were levelled against all the accused persons and the recovery of a Danda from the applicant was not in the presence of independent witness coupled with the fact that the applicant in jail since 15.12.2023 and criminal antecedents have been duly explained, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vinod Kumar Pandey, Anand Dubey, Prashant Dubey, Sadhana Yadav, Sushant Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Pramod Shukla, Ramakar Shukla, Ved Prakash Yadav Jeet Lal Verma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Let the applicant Jeet Lal Verma be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
November 7, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 6607 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench