SHANTI DEVI SHIKSHAN EVAM PRASHIKSHAN SHANSTHAN BHAKHARI THRU. CHAIRMAN VIJAY BAHADUR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SPECIAL SECY. DEPTT. AGRICULTURE U.P. LKO. AND 9 OTHERS
/10983/2025 · 2025-11-26
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184840 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184840 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10983 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India whereby the petitioner has made the main prayer(s):
"1) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari to quash impugned Order dated 27.10.2025 passed and issued by opposite party no.05 i.e. Deputy Director of Agriculture, Sultanpur U.P, by means of which he has directed the petitioner to deposit subsidy amount of Rs1,18,000/-(One Lakh, Eighteen Thousands Rupees) within a period of one week, in ex-parte manner without providing any kind of opportunity of hearing and without proving any enquiry report, contained as Annexure No.01 to the writ petition. II) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus Commanding opposite parties to not adopt any coercive measure in pursuance of impugned order dated 27.10.2025 passed by opposite party no.05 in the interest of justice. III) Issue any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem just, fit and proper under the circumstances of the case may also be passed in favor of the petitioner." We are of the view that the petitioner was not put to proper notice of the enquiry report. Accordingly, the respondent authorities are directed to provide the enquiry report to the petitioner and grant him opportunity of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinod Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Shanti Devi Shikshan Evam Prashikshan Shansthan Bhakhari Thru. Chairman Vijay Bahadur Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Special Secy. Deptt. Agriculture U.P. Lko. And 9 Others .....Respondent(s)
hearing. Once opportunity of hearing is granted, a reasoned order should be passed in accordance with law. The impugned order dated 27.10.2025 passed by respondent no.5/Deputy Director of Agriculture, Sultanpur, Uttar Pradesh is quashed and set aside. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 26, 2025 Mohit Singh/- WRIC No. 10983 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench