APHC010256402019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 11532/2019 Between: 1. MADDANKI KUMARI, W/O M. RAJU, 40 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, KOYYURU VILLAGE, BAPULAPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, KAKINADA, 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, MACHILIPATNAM 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TUNI RURAL CIRCLE TUNI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, THONDANGI P.S. THONDANGI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 6. DHADALA NOOKA RATNAM, D/O NOOKA RAJU, AGED 19 YEARS, KODADA VILLAGE, THONDANGI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, declaring the action of the 4th and 5th respondents in not only harassing and interfering with personal life and liberty of the petitioner without following due process of law, violating Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and issue consequential directions, directing the 4th and 5th respondents not to interfere with personal life and liberty of the petitioner and her family members without following due process of law, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents, particularly the 4th and 5'h respondents not to interfere with personal life and liberty of the petitioner, without following due process of law, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S V INDIRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO:11532 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: This Court after perusing the earlier proceedings gave a direction on 11.09.2025, to list the matter under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. However, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 18.09.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 11532 of 2019 Date: 18.09.2025 PSA