INDRESH KUMAR MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/9952/2024 · 2025-11-07
Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184838 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184838 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9952 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.
1. Case called out. None is present on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition whereas learned AGA is present. There is no request for pass over or adjournment of the case. 2. This Court had passed the following order on 03.01.2025:-
"Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State-respondent and perused the record. The petitioner seek issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the First Information Report dated 01.12.2024 bearing Case Crime No.0180 of 2024, under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangster & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, P.S. Mandhata, District Pratapgarh. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the case. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is distinguishable from rest of the accused as there is only one case against the petitioner. In the said case also while granting anticipatory bail, it was specifically noted that the petitioner was not named in the F.I.R. The petitioner is a school teacher and there is no criminal history against. Case for consideration is made out. Issue notice to opposite party no. 4. Let the pleadings be exchanged within four weeks. List this case after four weeks. Considering the submissions made, it is provided that till the next date of listing, petitioner shall not be arrested in pursuance to the First Information Report dated 01.12.2024 bearing Case Crime No.0180 of 2024, under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangster & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, P.S. Mandhata, District Pratapgarh. The petitioner shall, however, cooperate in the investigation and get his statements recorded before the Investigating Officer as and when he is called. If he does not do so then it can be a Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramakar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Indresh Kumar Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
ground for seeking vacation of this interim order. "
3.
Learned AGA, on the basis of instructions dated 07.11.2025 received from Police Station Mandhata, District Pratapgarh, which has been produced before this Court and taken on record, submits that the Charge Sheet No.101 dated 22.09.2025 has been filed in the court on 01.11.2025, therefore, this petition has lost it's efficacy. 4. Dismissed accordingly. November 7, 2025 Akanksha Sri/- CRLP No. 9952 of 2024 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench