Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18483 (GAU)

MD. ABDUL AZIZ v. MD. DIDAR HUSSAIN AND 2 ORS

I.A.(Civil)/2977/2024 · 2025-03-04

Devashis Baruah

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010194452024 2025:GAU-AS:2373 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2977/2024 MD. ABDUL AZIZ S/O- LATE RAHMAN @ ABDUL RAHMAN R/O- VILL.- TATIKATA PATHER P.O. P.S. AND MOUZA- MOIRABARI DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM VERSUS MD. DIDAR HUSSAIN AND 2 ORS S/O- LATE HATEM ALI R/O- VILL.- TATIKATA PATHER P.O. P.S. AND MOUZA- MOIRABARI DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM 2:MUSSTT. RAHIMA KHATUN D/O- LATE HATEM ALI R/O- VILL.- TATIKATA PATHER P.O. P.S. AND MOUZA- MOIRABARI DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM 3:MUSSTT. RUMENA D/O- LATE HATEM ALI R/O- VILL.- TATIKATA PATHER P.O. P.S. AND MOUZA- MOIRABARI DIST. MORIGAON Page No.# 2/2 ASSAM ------------ For the Applicant(s) : Ms. R. Choudhury, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. L. Mohan, Advocate BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 05.03.2025 Ms. R. Choudhury, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant submitted that she would not like to press the instant application. She however submitted that the withdrawal of the instant application should not prejudice petitioner to file appropriate application, if so advised before the learned Trial Court. 2. Taking into account the above, this Court closes the instant application on withdrawal. 3. However liberty is given to the petitioner to file appropriate application before the learned Trail Court, if so advised. JUDGE Comparing Assistant