HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10573 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J. 1. Ms. Shreya Prakash, Advocate, put in appearance on behalf of opposite party No. 2 and filed vakalatnama, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Ms. Shreya Prakash, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed with prayer to quash entire and consequential proceedings as well as cahrgesheet dated 20.10.2023 and summoning order dated 01.02.2024 in Criminal Case No. 48721 of 2024(State of U.P. Vs. Mandeep Singh Hora and Ors.), arising out of Case Crime No. 98 of 2023 under Sections 323, 504, 506, 498A IPC and 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station Manak Nagar, District-Lucknow, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate VII, Lucknow. 4. Earlier, the applicants approached this Court by filing Application U/S 482 No. 9277 of 2025, which was disposed of vide order dated 04.11.2025 with direction to Trial Court to verify the compromise entered between the parties and submit report. 5. In light of order of this Court dated 04.11.2025 passed in Application U/S 482 No. 9277 of 2025, compromise has been verified by the Trial Court vide order dated 02.12.2025, which has also been annexed as Anneure No.6 to Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sudhanshu Shekhar Tripathi, Raghav Bansal, Ritwika Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Inderjeet Kaur And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chif Secy. /Prin. Secy. Home And Another .....Opposite Party(s) this application. 6. Ms. Shreya Prakash, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 submitted that in case proceedings against the applicants is quashed, she would have no objection. 7. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the applicants and opposite party No. 2 do not want to pursue the case any further as stated by them. The matter has been mutually settled between the parties, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further. 8. Thus in view of the well settled principle of law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matters of Krishnappa & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka; 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 529, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Ors. vs. State of Gujarat and another; 2017 9 SCC 641, B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana; 2003(4) SCC 675, Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Burea of Investigation and another; (2008) 9 Supreme Court Cases 677, Gian Singh Vs. Stated of Punjab; (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab and another; (2014) Supreme Today 642, the proceedings of the aforesaid case is hereby quashed. 9. The present application is, accordingly allowed. December 15, 2025 ADY A482 No. 10573 of 2025 2 (Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMAR DEEP YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench