Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 184817 (ALL)

MOHD AZAD KHAN AND 7 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. EXCISE DEPTT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WPIL/1249/2025 · 2025-12-11

Indrajeet Shukla, Rajan Roy

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1249 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard. 2. Considering the provisions of law as per Ms. Akansha Dubey, Additional Chief Standing Counsel, three hospitals referred in the writ petition having a capacity of 20/10/10 beds are not covered for complying the restrictions for opening a liquor shop. 3. On being confronted, learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh seeking appropriate relief including challenging the vires of the aforesaid provisions of the Act, if necessary. 4. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. December 11, 2025 Raj Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satyendra Nath Mishra, Anjali Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Mohd Azad Khan And 7 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Excise Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench