Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18481 (KAR)

M/S MONISHA JEWELLERY v. M/S. UNION BANK OF INDIA

WP/6110/2021 · 2025-01-08

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:598 WP No. 6110 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 6110 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: M/S. MONISHA JEWELLERY PROP M.N.BALAMURUGAN, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT 1564, EAST END MAIN ROAD, 9TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 069. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. KAVITHA.D., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S. UNION BANK OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SENIOR AUTHORIZED OFFICER, OFFICE AT NO.6, GANDHI BAZAAR, BASAVANAGUDI, BANGALORE-560 004. 2. M/S.UNION BANK OF INDIA EARLIER CORPORATION BANK, AUTHORIZED OFFICER, ASSET RECOVERY BRANCH, OFFICE AT NO.583, 584, 2ND FLOOR, PUJA COMPLEX, AVENUE ROAD, BANGALORE KARNATAKA-560 002. 3. M/S. UNION BANK OF INDIA, AGM, OFFICE AT 10-A, CHANDRAKIRAN, KASTURBA ROAD, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA-560 001. Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:598 WP No. 6110 of 2021 4. M/S. UNION BANK OF INDIA, DGM, OFFICE AT 10-A, CHANDRAKIRAN, KASTURBA ROAD, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. DIVYA PURANDAR., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1; R3 & 4-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Smt.Divya Purandar., counsel for caveator/ respondent No.1 has appeared in person. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent Bank to consider the representation Letter dated 12.03.2021 as per Annexure-C to clear the entire dues. 3. Counsel Smt.Divya Purandar., on instruction submits that the petitioner opted for One Time Settlement and has cleared the loan amount in the year 2023. Counsel therefore, submits that an appropriate order may be passed. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:598 WP No. 6110 of 2021 The oral submission made by counsel for respondent No.1 is placed on record. 4. Because the petitioner opted for One Time Settlement and has cleared the loan amount in the year 2023, nothing survives for consideration in the Writ Petition at this juncture. The Writ Petition is liable to be dismissed. 5. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 45