SITA RAM v. ADDITINAL COMMISSIONER FAIZABAD AND 19 ORS
WRIC/1001892/2006 · 2025-11-18
Irshad Ali
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184803 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184803 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 1001892 of 2006 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE IRSHAD ALI, J.
1. List of cases has been revised.
2. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners, however, Sri RK Srivastava, learned counsel for private respondent and Sri Shatrughan Chaudhary, learned Additional CSC for respondent - State are present.
3. The case is dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. November 18, 2025 Adarsh K Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : M.C.Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C, R.K. Srivastava, R.N.Gupta, Rakesh Kumar Srivastava (Irshad Ali,J.) Sita Ram .....Petitioner(s) Additinal Commissioner Faizabad And 19 Ors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ADARSH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench