ASHOK KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE AND 6 OTHERS
WPIL/1088/2025 · 2025-11-04
S Q H Rizvi
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184799 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184799 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1088 of 2025 Court No. - 20 HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J.
1. Heard Sri Vijay Pal Verma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Mukesh Mohan, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents, Sri Atul Srivastava, Advocate holding brief of Sri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 5-Gaon Sabha and perused the material brought on record.
2. By means of the present public interest litigation the petitioner has prayed for a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite parties concerned to conduct a proper inquiry of the public land situated at Village Saidpur (Pasiyapara), Pargana and Tehsil- Akbarpur, District Ambedkar Nagar and to remove illegal encroachment from the public utility land.
3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the proceeding under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 was initiated and order was passed on 01.07.2024 by the Assistant Collector/Tehsildar, Akbarpur, District Ambedkar Nagar.
4. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State respondents on the basis of the written instructions received from Tehsildar-Akbarpur, has made a statement at the Bar that an application for restoration of the order dated 01.07.2024 has been filed by the private opposite party no. 6 & 7. The said application for restoration is already pending for consideration before the Tehsildar (respondent no. 4). Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Pal Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Ashok Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue And 6 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. Taking into consideration the statement as made by the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State respondents that the matter is subjudice before the competent Court and the next date in the matter is fixed on 07.11.2025.
6. In view of the above, this Court finds no reason to entertain the present petition at this stage. Accordingly this petition is consigned to the records. November 4, 2025 Arun WPIL No. 1088 of 2025 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench