T.Villavan Kothai v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Dcb, Madurai
CRL OP(MD)/18582/2025 · 2025-11-27
Sunder Mohan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184790 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184790 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.18582 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Crl.O.P.(MD).No.18582 of 2025 and Crl.M.P.(MD).No.15346 of 2025 T.Villavan Kothai
... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by, The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Madurai District. Crime No.18/2025 ... 1st Respondent/Complainant 2.B.Ganesan ... 2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant
Prayer
: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to call for the records in Crime No.18 of 2025 on the file of the 1st respondent police and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.A.K.Manikkam For R-1 : Mr.R.Meenakshi Sundaram Additional Public Prosecutor For R-2 : Mr.S.M.Mohamed Saleem 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.18582 of 2025 ORDER This Criminal Original Petition is filed to quash the impugned FIR in Crime No.18 of 2025 on the file of the first respondent Police, which was registered for the offences under Section 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC. 2. The gist of the allegations in the FIR is that the petitioner had executed a sale deed in favour of the defacto complainant for a valid consideration for the land, which was allotted for public purposes and cheated the defacto complainant and thus committed the aforesaid offences. 3. Admittedly, the petitioner and the second respondent have since arrived at a compromise and decided to give a quietus to the entire dispute. The parties have filed a joint compromise memo dated 27.11.2025. 4. The petitioner, namely, T.Villavan Kothai (Aadhaar No.8235 9910 6979) and the defacto complainant, namely, B.Ganesan (Aadhaar No.3321 0716 7542) are present before this Court in person. They are identified by Mr.A.Saravanan, Special Sub Inspector of Police, DCB-II, Madurai District. The defacto complainant confirms the compromise and states that he does not wish to pursue the case. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.18582 of 2025
5. In view of the same, considering the nature of the offences and the compromise arrived between the parties, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the impugned FIR pending investigation. Accordingly, the impugned FIR in Crime No.18 of 2025 on the file of the first respondent is quashed and the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. The joint compromise memo dated 27.11.2025 shall form part of this order.
The petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) as costs to the credit of the “District Siddha Medical Officer, CCRI, Periyakulam” (Account No.10767823177, IFSC Code: SBIN0000898, MICR Code: 625002601) forthwith and file a photocopy of the receipt along with a memo reporting compliance in the Registry. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 27.11.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No Lm
3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.18582 of 2025 To 1.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Madurai District. 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.18582 of 2025 SUNDER MOHAN, J. Lm Crl.O.P(MD).No.18582 of 2025 27.11.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis