HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 95 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed seeking a direction to the court concerned to accept a personal bond and two sureties in all 2 cases mentioned in paragraph-4 of the memo of application. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is involved in 2 cases and has been granted bail, but he is unable to provide separate bail bonds and sureties in all cases. He, therefore, prays that trial court may be directed to accept the same bail bond and sureties in all 2 cases mentioned in paragraph-4 of the memo of application. In support of his submission, he has placed reliance upon the decision of the Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal (Cri) No.8914-8915 of 2018, Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P., dated 29.10.2018 to establish that Hon’ble Supreme Court in the aforesaid case has directed to accept one personal bond and two sureties for all cases. 4. Learned AGA does not dispute the aforesaid legal proposition. 5. Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions and the dictum of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in this regard, the trial court is directed to accept one personal bond and two sureties to its satisfaction in 2 cases mentioned in paragraph-4 of the memo of application from the applicant and release him on bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nasreen Bano Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rumi Chauhan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Application stands disposed of. December 11, 2025 Rao/- NA529 No. 95 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench