Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18478 (BOM)

THE CHIEF ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION CENTRAL RAILWAY SOLAPUR v. DINAKAR SATVA WAGHMARE AND ORS

CA/8528/2024 · 2025-04-09

Shri S G Chapalgaonkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 ca 8527.24+.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 44 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8527 OF 2024 IN FAST/14656/2024 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8528 OF 2024 IN FAST/14656/2024 The Chief Engineer Construction Central Railway Solapur Versus Dinakar Satva Waghmare and others. ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. D.V. Soman AGP for Respondents: Mr. D B Bhange Advocate for Respondents : Mrs M.A. Kulkarni … CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. Dated : April 09, 2025 PER COURT :- 1. Heard Mr. Soman, learned advocate appearing for the applicant. 2. The applicant seeks to condone the delay of 566 days caused in filing the appeal. 3. Considering the submissions advanced, and reasons as stated in the application, it is apparent that delay has been occasioned on account of administrative reasons. The respondents have not controverted contents of the application nor applicants took any advantage by making the delay. 4. In that view of the matter, sufficient cause is made out. In the result the application is allowed. Delay of 566 days caused in filing the appeal is condoned. Appeal be registered. 2025:BHC-AUG:10924 2 ca 8527.24+.odt Stay application :- Mr. Soman, learned advocate appearing for the applicant submits that entire amount as per the award passed by the Tribunal has been deposited. Office endorsement dated 12.2.2025 shows that demand draft no.919831 has been deposited for amount of Rs.20,32,541/- Hence, there is compliance of condition. In that view of the matter, application for stay is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ and disposed of. ( S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. ) … aaa-