APHC010256232013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 17145/2013 Between: 1. M/S SREE RAMA AGENCIES, W.G. DIST., HPC WHOLESALE KEROSENE DEALER, NIDADAVOLE - 534 301, W.G. DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, R. RAMUDU ...PETITIONER AND 1. SENIOR INSTALLATION MANAGER H P C L E G DIST, Rep. by its Senior Installation Manager, HPC Rajahmundry Terminal, Gummaladoddi Korukonda Mandal, East Godavari District - 533 289 ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent and its sub- ordinates in not permitting the Petitioner to engage 15 years old Tank Trucks for lifting the PDS kerosene quota allotted to it every month for distribution to the retailers as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the Respondent and its subordinates to deliver the kerosene quota to the Tank Trucks engaged by the Petitioner without reference to the year of making of the Tank Trucks and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 20809 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 2 JS,J W.P.No.17145/2013 direct the Respondent and its subordinates not to insist upon the Petitioner to engage the Tank Trucks, having been manufactured below 15 years for lifting PDS kerosene quota for distribution to the retailers, pending disposal of the present Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following 3 JS,J W.P.No.17145/2013 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 13.08.2025 KAS