VIJAY KUMAR RASTOGI and ANR. v. STATE OF U.P. and ANR.
/9206/2019 · 2025-12-04
Rajeev Bharti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184759 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184759 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9206 of 2019 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. Case called out. The matter pertains to the year 2019. None is present on behalf of the applicants nor any request for adjournment or pass over has been made. However, learned AGA is present. From perusal of the record, it indicates that in the present case, no interim/stay order is operating. It appears that the case has lost its relevance due to efflux of time and has rendered infructuous. In view of above, this application is dismissed as having become infructuous. December 4, 2025 Shravan Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Prem Shanker Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Bharti,J.) Vijay Kumar Rastogi And Anr. .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And Anr. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench