HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3474 of 2025 ALONG WITH CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5129 of 2025 ALONG WITH CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2887 of 2025 ALONG WITH Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nikhil Mishra, Avinash Singh Vishen Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sachin Verma, Praveen Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manoj Kumar Mishra, Akash Tiwari, Anjali Dubey, Arpit Dwivedi, Rajiv Mishra, Soniya Mishra Soni Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Anuj Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Surendra Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko .....Opposite Party(s) Sushil @ Balle .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3259 of 2025 ALONG WITH CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4574 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicants seek enlargement on bail in FIR No.14 of 2025, under Section 70(1), 303(2), 351(2) BNS, P.S. Mill Area, District Raebareli. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants argues that on the same allegation, co- accused who was also not named in the FIR was enlarged on bail vide order dated 16.10.2025. The allegations against the applicants are similar to the co-accused who has been enlarged on bail. Criminal antecedents of the applicants have been duly explained in the application. BAIL No. 3474 of 2025 2 Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Chandra Bhanu Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Neeraj Pandey, Shashwat Pratap Singh, Vyas Narayan Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Lalta .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Atul Kumar @ Atul Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the fact that on the same allegation co-accused has been granted bail, the applicants are entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. In view thereof, the applications are allowed. 6. Let the applicants Anuj Yadav, Surendra Kumar, Sushil @ Balle, Lalta & Atul Kumar @ Atul Yadav be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on their furnishing a personal bond each with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicants shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicants shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which they are accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 30, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 3474 of 2025 3 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench