1 (MCC No. 257 of 2022) 2025:CGHC:35898 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 257 of 2022 1 - Govind S/o Shri Pratap Banjara Aged About 68 Years Resident Of Village - Kottara, Tahsil - Charama, District - North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Suraj Bai W/o Gopal Ram Aged About 45 Years Caste - Banjara, R/o Village - Girhola, Tahsil - Charama, District - North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh. --- Applicant(s) versus 1 - Urmila Bai Wd/o Laxmi Narayan Aged About 50 Years Caste - Banjara, R/o Village - Kottarra, Tahsil - Charama, District - North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh. (Died and Deleted vide this order) 2 - Manharan S/o Laxmi Narayan Aged About 32 Years Caste - Banjara, R/o Village - Kottarra, Tahsil - Charama, District - North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Smt. Tarabati D/o Laxmi Narayan Aged About 30 Years Wife Of Jitendra Kumar, Caste - Banjara, R/o Village - Kottarra, Tahsil - Charama, District - North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Smt. Meena Bai D/o Laxmi Narayan Aged About 29 Years Wife Of Parmeshwar, R/o Village - Kottarra, Tahsil - Charama, District - North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Sambai Wd/o Ramnath Kalar Aged About 50 Years R/o Kottara, Tahsil - Charama, District - Kanker, Chhattisgarh. 6 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Kanker, ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Digitally signed by ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Date: 2025.07.26 11:33:52 +0530 2 (MCC No. 257 of 2022) District - Kanker, Chhattisgarh --- Non-applicant(s) (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicant : Mr. U.R. Koshaley, Advocate For Non-applicant Nos.3 & 4 : Mr. Amit Kumar Sahu, Advocate For Non-applicant No.5 : Mr. Arjun Lal Singroul, Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB - Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 24.07.2025 1. Heard on IA No.01, which is an application seeking condonation of delay in filing the application for restoration of Second Appeal No. 430/2006. 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 388 days caused in filing the instant MCC is hereby condoned. 3. Also heard on IA No.03, which is an application for deleting the name of respondent No.1-Urmila Bai. 4. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Let the name of respondent No.1-Urmila Bai be deleted from the cause-title of this MCC by tomorrow i.e. 25.07.2025. 5. With the consent of the parties, heard finally. 6. This MCC has been filed seeking restoration of SA No. 430/2006 which was dismissed for want of prosecution by 3 (MCC No. 257 of 2022) order of this Court dated 20.03.2019. 6. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. SA No.430/2006 is restored to its original number for its hearing and disposal in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, this MCC is allowed. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge @d!t!