Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 184732 (ALL)

RAM SAKAL KEWAT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.

BAIL/10724/2025 · 2025-12-01

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10724 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard Sri Anil Kumar Nishad, learned counsel for the applicant as also the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No. 214 of 2025 under sections 304(2), 319(2), 318(2), 3(5), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 317(2), 112 BNS, P.S. Patti, District Pratapgarh. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is also stated that on similar allegations the co-accused Lallu Kewat has been granted bail by a Coordinate Bench vide order dated 19.11.2025 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 11358 of 2025. It is also alleged that the applicant has no previous criminal history and he is in jail since 17.07.2025. It is also alleged that the applicant is entitled to liberty of bail on the ground of parity. 4. Learned A.G.A. Sri Veerpal Singh has opposed the prayer for bail, but he does not dispute the facts stated above. 5. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case particularly the fact on similar allegations the co-accused Lallu Kewat has been granted bail by a Coordinate Bench, it is a fit case for bail on the ground of parity. The application is accordingly allowed. 6. Let the applicant Ram Sakal Kewat be released on bail in the aforesaid F.I.R./Case Crime No. 214 of 2025 on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, on the following conditions: (i) the applicant will not tamper with the prosecution evidence; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar Nishad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ram Sakal Kewat .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) (ii) the applicant will not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant will appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court. December 1, 2025 A.Nigam BAIL No. 10724 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench