Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 184730 (MAD)

Paulraj v. The District Collector

WP(MD)/34323/2025 · 2025-11-27

G R Swaminathan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P(MD)No.34323 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P(MD)No.34323 of 2025 Paulraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Dindigul District. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nilakottai Division, Dindigul District. 4.The Tahsildar, Nilakottai, Dindigul District. 5.GTL Infrastructure Limited, City Centre 3rd Floor, Old No.232 & 186 Purasawalkam High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st Respondent to Permit the petitioner Uninstall the left unmaintained cell Phone Tower of the 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.34323 of 2025 5th respondent situated at S.No.279/8c Jambadurakottai Village, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District, on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 24.11.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Joseph Jerry For Respondents : Mr.R.Ragavendran Government Advocate for R1 to R4 ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the writ petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the respondents 1 to 4. 2.The petitioner is the owner of the petition-mentioned land. He entered into an agreement with the fifth respondent and permitted them to install a cellphone towers in his land. The lease period has long since expired. For the last six years, they are not paying any rent. The petitioner called upon them to remove the cellphone tower. Since the licensees did not respond, the present writ petition has been filed. 3.As on date, the cellphone towers have become disfunctional. The petitioner is permitted to dismantle the petition-mentioned cellphone towers 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.34323 of 2025 and sell the resulting scrap and appropriate the sale proceeds towards his dues from the fifth respondent. The petitioner shall send one more communication to the fifth respondent. This order copy shall also be enclosed along with the said communication. Such a communication shall be issued by the petitioner within a period of one day after receipt of the order copy. The petitioner shall wait for exactly fifteen days after the receipt of the said communication. If the fifth respondent has any grievance, they are entitled to file a review application before this Court immediately. This order can be enforced by the writ petitioner only after thirty days after the receipt of a copy of this order. 4.This writ petition is allowed accordingly. No costs. 27.11.2025 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To 1.The District Collector, Dindigul District. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nilakottai Division, Dindigul District. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.34323 of 2025 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi 4.The Tahsildar, Nilakottai, Dindigul District. W.P(MD)No.34323 of 2025 27.11.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis