KAMTA PRASAD GAUTAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DAIRY DEVELOPMENT LKO AND 5 OTHERS
/14499/2025 · 2025-12-16
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184701 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184701 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14499 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Vakalatnama filed by Mr. Anagh Shukla, learned counsel on behalf of the respondent no.3 is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Pradeep Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 & 2, Mr. Anagh Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 and Mr. Pankaj Patel, learned counsel for the respondent nos.4 & 6. Instant petition has been filed seeking following reliefs:-
"(i). Issue a wit order or directions in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay the balance amount leave encashment amount of 300 days and gratuity amount with interest as shown in annexure no 4 to this writ petition as per the Norms framed by the RBI. (ii). Issue a wit order or directions in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 6 to decide the pending representations as contained in annexure no 3 to this writ petition." Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the balance amount of leave encashment of 300 days and gratuity amount with interest has still not been paid to the petitioner. He submitted that the decision is to be taken by the respondent no.6 which is pending at his level. He submits Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nirbhay Kumar Singh, Buddha Priya Gautam, Krishan Mohan, Nitin Verma, Pradeep Kumar Singh, Shiv Kant Shukla, Shree Chandra Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Anagh Shukla, Pankaj Patel, Sandeep Sharma Kamta Prasad Gautam .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Dairy Development Lko And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to raise his claim regarding payment of leave encashement and gratuity amount for which the petitioner is entitled and the respondent no.6 may be directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsels for the respondents have no objection to the submission aforesaid.
Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to to raise his claim regarding payment of leave encashement and gratuity amount for which the petitioner is entitle before the respondent no.6/General Manager/Unit In charge Ayodhya Dudgh Utpadak Sahkari Limited, Ayodhya, within fifteen days and in case such representation is moved, the respondent no.6 is directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within further period of six weeks. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. December 16, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 14499 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench