LATA YADAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME AND 7 OTHERS
WRIC/5944/2025 · 2026-02-16
Manjive Shukla, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1847 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1847 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 5944 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner(s), even in the revised call.
2. Shri Prakhar Mishra, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State respondent(s) is present.
3. In light of the fact that learned counsel for the petitioners have not appeared in the revised call, we are of the view that the petitioners are no longer interested in pursuing this writ petition.
4. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for default.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. October 8, 2025 Raj Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vikas Yadav, Arpit Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Suresh Chandra Srivastava (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Lata Yadav And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench