HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11719 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Vinod Kumar Shukla, learned counsel who has filed his power on behalf of respondent Nos.2, 3 and learned Standing Counsel, who appears on behalf of State-respondent No.1. 2. This petition has been filed with the following prayers :- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opp. parties concerned to record name of petitioner along with name of opp. party no.4 over the house no.427/038 (006A) situated at Tikari Julhan Kashmiri Mohalla Ward- Zone-6 Nagar Nigam Lucknow of 1/2 portion and make assessment of house tax in his name in the interest of justice. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opp. parties concerned to consider and decide the application dated 06.10.2025 of the petitioners as contained in Annexure No.1 to this writ petition expeditiously within the stipulated time as provided by this Hon'ble court in the interest of justice. (iii) Issue any other order or direction which is deemed just, fit and proper be passed in favour of the petitioner. (iv) Allow the writ petition with costs." 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has moved a mutation application, but the same is not being decided, although respondent No.4 has given a no-objection certificate in Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vimal Kumar Pandey, Ram Khelawan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Namit Sharma Mansoor Khan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Urban Development Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) favour of the petitioner's application. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.2 and 3, on the basis of oral instructions, has stated that the application has been moved only on 06.10.2025. The earlier alleged application is not in the prescribed format and, therefore, could not have been considered as it is only a representation. 5. This petition is disposed of without entering into the merits of the controversy, with a direction to the respondents to decide the application of the petitioner dated 06.10.2025 strictly in accordance with law after giving an opportunity of hearing to all concerned, within a period of three months from the date a copy of this order is produced before them. December 2, 2025 Shubhankar WRIC No. 11719 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHUBHANKAR THAKUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench