IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Ex. Pet No. 936 of 2024 Decided on: 6th January, 2025 _________________________________________________________________ Raksha Chauhan ....Petitioner Versus State of HP & Ors …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, 1 Whether approved for reporting? ____________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Rajul Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Dalip K. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge On 06.11.2024, a prima-facie, observation was made that the consideration order dated 18.10.2024 does not appear to have been passed in consonance with the judgment. At the request of leaned counsel for the respondents-State, matter had been adjourned thereafter from time to time to enable them to have further instructions. Instructions have not forth-come. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - subject to order passed by the respondents on 18.10.2024, whereby, case of the petitioner was rejected, the present proceedings be closed. However, liberty be reserved to the petitioner to seeks appropriate remedy as may be available to her in law for redressal of her surviving grievances, if any. Prayer is accepted. Granting such liberty, present execution petition is disposed of Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge January 6, 2025 R.Atal