Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 184689 (ALL)

KULDEEP v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

/11114/2025 · 2025-11-26

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11114 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.0317 of 2025 under sections 64(2)M, 351(2), 352 BNS and section 5(j)(2)/6 POCSO Act and section 3(1)(da), 3(1)(dha) and section 3(2)5 SC/ST Act, P.S. Ishanagar, District Lakhimpur Kheri. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant aged about 16 years has informed that on the false pretext of marriage, the physical relations were formed by the applicant and the she was also carrying a fetus of five months and now the applicant refusing to marry her. The ultrasound report found to be positive. Subsequently, it was informed that the fetus was aborted. There is no definite document with regard to the exact age of the victim. 4. Considering the fact that the relationship continued over a span of five months, the applicant who is in custody since 19.07.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled for the bail. Thus the bail application is allowed. 5. Let the applicant Kuldeep be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ravindra Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Kuldeep .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s) satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 26, 2025 VNP/- BAIL No. 11114 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench