Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 184687 (ALL)

RADHEY SHYAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.

BAIL/10481/2025 · 2025-10-30

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10481 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.441 of 2025, under Sections 85, 115(2), 108 of BNS and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station Tambaur, District Sitapur. 3. It is argued by the Counsel for the applicant that the mother-in-law and the father-in-law have been granted the benefit of anticipatory bail vide orders dated 16.10.2025. The applicant is the husband of the deceased. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the fact that the allegations against the applicant to be similar to the co-accused, who have been granted the benefit of anticipatory bail and there being nothing against the applicant to suggest that soon before her death, the victim was subjected to any physical or mental harassment in relation to any demand of dowry coupled with the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 06.09.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Radhey Shyam be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sushil Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Radhey Shyam .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 30, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 10481 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench