HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3145 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned counsel for the opposite party. 2. Learned counsel for the opposite party has submitted that in compliance of the judgment and order dated 20.08.2025, passed by the writ court in Writ A No. 9298 of 2025, the representation of the applicant has been decided by passing an order dated 07.11.2025, the copy of which has been provided during the course of arguments, which is taken on record and the photocopy of the same has been provided to the learned counsel for the applicant, the same has been challenged by the applicant by filing a writ petition, which is pending. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the submission made by the learned counsel for the opposite party is incorrect and he should file an affidavit to bring on record all the said facts. 4. On being asked from learned counsel for the applicant whether representation of the applicant has been decided or not, he has replied that it has been decided. The next query put forth by this court is whether any writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 07.11.2025, he has submitted that the writ petition has been filed, then what wrong statement has been made by learned counsel for the opposite party? 5. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the judgment and order dated 20.08.2025, passed by the writ court in Writ A No. 9298 of 2025 has been complied with and now nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present contempt application and for all other Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Avinash Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ran Vijay Singh Satya Prakash .....Applicant(s) A.K. Yadav Awadhesh Kumar Yadav Exe.Engineer Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. Ambedkar Nagar .....Opposite Party(s) practical purposes, the present contempt application has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous. 6. As such, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. 7. Notice, if any, stands discharged. November 25, 2025 DiVYa CAPL No. 3145 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench