HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. - 177 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Instant review application has been filed alongwith an application seeking condonation of delay being I.A. No.1 of 2025. 3. As per office report, there is a delay of 164 days in filing the review application. 4. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant and pleaded in the application that the delay occurred as the deponent could not arrange the money for filing the same; no other ground has been pleaded. Writ petition was decided on 05.04.2025, thereafter, the execution proceedings are being contested by the applicant and thus, the knowledge with regard to the order dated 05.04.2025 is evident. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant was also heard while deciding the writ petition. 6. Apart from stating that on account of lack of money the review application could not be filed within time, no material has been placed to argue or plead the financial status of the applicant. No material has been placed to justify the huge delay of 164 days. 7. It is clear that the applicant had lost the rent suit, his writ petition has Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : S.P. Singh Somvanshi, Alok Kumar, Shailesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Smt. Ram Devi And 4 Others .....Applicant(s) Ganesh Prasad Yadav .....Opposite Party(s) also been decided and only to delay the execution, present review application has been filed. 8. No material for review as is prescribed under Section 114 CPC exists. 9. Finding the delay condonation application to be malafide, the same cannot be condoned, as such, I.A. No.1 of 2025 is rejected. Consequently, the review application is also rejected. November 6, 2025 nishant CMRAD No. 177 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench