SYED QAMAR ABBAS RIZVI AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME VIDHAN SABHA MARG LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/9732/2025 · 2025-12-05
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184662 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184662 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9732 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.
2. This application has been filed with the following prayer:-
"To set aside the impugned summoning order dated 15.09.2025 passed in case no. 27528 of 2025 by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bahraich by means of which the applicant no. 1 and 2 were summoned in F.I.R. No. 156 of 2024, P.S.- Dargah Shareef District- Bahraich under sections 498 A, 323, 504, 506, I.P.C. and 3/4 D.P. Act for facing trial and applicant no. 3 and 4 were summoned under section 498-A and 3/4 D.P. Act without passing any reasoned order, and to quash the charge sheet dated 25.08.2024."
3. After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the applicants submit that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicants may be permitted to move discharge application through counsel and suitable directions may be issued for expeditious disposal of the same.
4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in grant of aforesaid prayer.
5. In view of above, it is provided that applicants are permitted to move their discharge application(s) through counsel within four weeks from today and in case any such application(s) are being filed, same shall be Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sunil Kumar Singh, Manish Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Syed Qamar Abbas Rizvi And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Vidhan Sabha Marg Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
heard and decided expeditiously after hearing the parties, in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order.
6. Till the aforesaid period of four weeks and during pendency of discharge application, no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.
7. In case of failure on the part of applicants in moving the discharge application(s) within the aforesaid period, they will not be entitled to the benefit of this order.
8. With above directions, this application stands disposed of. December 5, 2025 Arpan A482 No. 9732 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench