Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 184660 (ALL)

AJEET SINGH v. U.P. JAL NIGAM (URBAN) THRU. MANAGING DIRECTOR LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

/13371/2025 · 2025-11-20

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13371 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Krishna Vishwakarma, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Rishabh Kapoor, learned counsel for the opposite parties and perused the record. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs :- "1) To issue a writ order or direction in nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to make payment of arrears of salary, arrears of dearness allowance/ dearness relief and pensionary benefits w.e.f. 01.01.2006 to 11.03.2010 on account of implementation of VI Pay Commission and providing the petitioner actual benefit of the revised pay Scale as per the recommendations of VI Pay Commission w.e.f. 01.01.2006 to the petitioner, forthwith. 2)To issue a writ order or direction in nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to make payment of arrears of difference of salary to the petitioner after making Fixation of salary by granting time scale benefits of election grade and promotional pay scale on completion of 8 years, 14 years, 19 years and 24 years of continuous satisfactory services." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no.4/The Chief Engineer (A-2), U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban), Lucknow and the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prashant Chandra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rishabh Kapoor Ajeet Singh .....Petitioner(s) U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban) Thru. Managing Director Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) opposite party no. 4 may be directed to consider and decide the same within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties has no objection to the contentions aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case,the petitioner is given liberty to move a fresh representation, while raising all his claims and grounds before the opposite party no. 4/ The Chief Engineer (A-2), U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban), Lucknow within the period of 15 days form today and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 4 is directed to consider and decide the same within further period of six weeks, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby disposed of. November 20, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 13371 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench