Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 184655 (ALL)

MAYARAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

BAIL/4986/2025 · 2025-11-13

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4986 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 358 of 2024, under sections 103(1), 3(5) BNS, P.S. B.K.T., District Lucknow. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that on 21.11.2024 certain money was taken from brother of the informant for gambling after keeping his mobile phone as security and subsequently all accused and deceased were drinking together and subsequently he was found dead and apprehension was expressed that applicant and other co accused have committed the offence in question. Cause of death as per post mortem report is ante mortem head injuries. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that co accused were enlarged on bail by trial court itself. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering that there are no eye witness to the incident and the applicant has been linked with the offence based upon apprehension and there is no recovery of any weapon from the applicant, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 24.11.2024 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Prince Singh, Bishnu Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Arun Kumar, Krishna Gopal, Prem Kumar Verma Mayaram .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Let the applicant Mayaram be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 13, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 4986 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench