HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10858 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has approached opposite party nos.3/ Commissioner of Police, District- Lucknow for lodging the F.I.R., however no heed has been paid in the matter in question. So, the petitioner has approached this Court with the following main relief:- "I. Issue any appropriate writ or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding and directing the opposite party No. 1 & 2, to take lawful action against opposite party Nos. 3 & 4 for not communicating any action/refusal taken on the petitioner's statutory application dt. 03.07.2025 moved under Section 154 Cr.P.C. as per the law settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh & Others (2014) 2 SCC 1, in the interest of Justice. II. Issue any appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, commanding the opposite party no. 1 & 2 to decide the representation of petitioner dt. 25.08.2025 within stipulated time and period as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice. Copy of the application dated 25.08.2025. III. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, commanding and directing to the opposite party No. 2 to take appropriate steps so as to initiate departmental proceedings for non-compliance of judgment and order as law settled by the Hon'ble Apex Court Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others 2014 (2) SCC 1, against the opposite party No. 3 for securing the ends of justice. IV. Issue any appropriate writ, order or direction thereby summoning and perusing the General Diary of the police station concerned of the relevant time to the present Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sajjad Husain, Kulsoom Firoz, Nooruddin Khan` Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Mohd. Rehan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) case and pass appropriate order(s) in view thereof for securing the ends of justice." 3. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the record as well as taking into consideration the law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others reported in (2014) 2 SCC 1, we hereby direct the petitioner to approach opposite party no.3/Commissioner of Police, District- Lucknow in respect to the grievances which he has raised in the present writ petition and thereafter opposite party no.3 shall take appropriate steps in the matter in question as per law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lalita Kumari (supra). 4. With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. November 17, 2025 Haseen U. CRLP No. 10858 of 2025 2 (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench