Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 184606 (ALL)

AMIT KUMAR @ ANKIT SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. HOME U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER

BAIL/11011/2025 · 2025-11-14

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11011 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 34 of 2025, under sections 84, 352, 351(2), 64, 127(4) BNS, P.S. Barasgawar, District Unnao. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that daughter of the informant was married and had come alongwith her brother in law to the village of the informant and subsequently applicant had enticed her. The tentative age of the victim is around 27 years. In the statement under Section 180 BNSS the victim admitted having gone with the applicant to the Ahmedabad and then to Kanpur. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances and the age of the victim, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 6.5.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Amit Kumar @ Ankit Sharma be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shyam Karan Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Amit Kumar @ Ankit Sharma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 14, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 11011 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench