Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 184598 (ALL)

SANIDHYA MITTAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND 3 OTHERS

/7571/2025 · 2025-12-02

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7571 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the respondents no.1 to 3. No notice is being issued to the respondent No.4 taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed. 2. Instant petition has been filed praying for a quashing of the FIR No.243 of 2025, under Sections 316(2), 336(3) of B.N.S., 2023, Police Station Hasanganj, District Unnao. 3. Learned AGA on the basis of averments contained in para 6 of the counter affidavit, which has been filed today, states that a final report dated 14.09.2025 has been submitted in the matter before the supervisory authority. 4. Upon the same being pointed out learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not intend to press the writ petition and prays that the same may be dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. December 2, 2025 prateek Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kartikey Dubey, Ramesh Chandra Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Anoop Srivastava (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Sanidhya Mittal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench