BRAJESH URF BIJJO S/O VASUDEV v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/6210/2025 · 2025-06-18
Maneesh Sharma V J
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18458 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18458 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:23324] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6210/2025 Brajesh Urf Bijjo S/o Vasudev, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Durgasi, Police Station Suroth, District Karauli. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Hindaun City). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yunus Khan for Mr. Jiya Ur Rahman For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA (V. J.)
Order 18/06/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.155/2025 registered at Police Station Surauth, District Karauli for the offence punishable under Sections 303(2) Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 4 and 21 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he is in judicial custody since 26.04.2025. He further submits that compounding fees for mineral concerned has already been deposited. Tractor in question has already been released by the authorities; the trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose, so, petitioner may be released on bail.
[2025:RJ-JP:23324] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6210/2025]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. Heard learned counsel for both the parties and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the fact that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 26.04.2025; the compounding fees for mineral concerned has already been deposited and the tractor in question has already been released by the authorities; trial of the case may take considerable time, thus, without commenting any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow this bail application.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Brajesh Urf Bijjo S/o Vasudev shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
7. It is also made clear that the petitioner shall not tamper with any evidence nor would influence the witnesses in the case.
8. It is made clear that the petitioner shall not involve in any offence(s) of similar nature during the currency of this bail.
(MANEESH SHARMA (V. J.)),J SOURAV /77