HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12624 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. December 3, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anant Tewari, Avdhesh Shukla (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Kamlendra Nath Mishra .....Petitioner(s) Baroda U.P. Gramin Bank Thru Chairman And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench