HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12861 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, Mr. Anand Dwivedi, learned Counsel for opposite party no. 1 and Ms. Nidhi Singh, learned counsel for opposite party nos. 2 & 3. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following main relief:- "A writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus Directing to the opposite party no-3 Additional General Manager, (Unit Head) ITI limited, Doorbhash Nagar, Raebareli, U.P. to pay post retiral dues total amount of Privileged leave encashment payable to the Petitioner, Which are admittedly due available for the values of Privilege leave encashment amount along with interest." 3. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, without entering into merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioner to move a fresh representation before opposite party No. 3 i.e. Additional General Manager (Unit Head) ITI Limited, Raebareli, U.P. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided within period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. In case petitioner is found entitled for the aforesaid benefits, actual payment thereof shall be ensured within a period of eight weeks thereafter. The concerned authority shall also consider the aspect of interest on delayed payment. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 4, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Nidhi Singh (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Surya Prakash Dixit .....Petitioner(s) U.O.I Thru Secy. Deptt. Of Telecommunication Min. Of Comm. New Delhi And 2 Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench