HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 30645 of 2019 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Badrul Hasan, learned AGA for the State of U.P. and Sri Narendra Gupta, learned counsel for the private opposite party(s). 2. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):- "(i) no. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party 2 to pronounce final order on the complaint of the petitioner on which final hearing has taken place on 30.09.2019 under provisions of section 145 Cr.P.C. and by taking into account the police report so submitted, in the interest of justice. (ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 2 to ensure compliance of the interim order dated 05.04.2014 passed by the Additional Commissioner Lucknow Division Lucknow in Revision No. 1356 (13-14) so preferred by the petitioner and further restrain the opposite party no. 4 and 5 from making depredations on gata no. 76, 152, 213 and 327 which is under adjudication in revision no. 1356 (13-14), in the interest of justice. (iii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 2 to take decision and necessary action for restraining the private respondents from making any depredations on the land in dispute after taking in to consideration the report so submitted by the local police for maintenance of peace and tranquility in the area, in the interest of justice." 3. Sri Badrul Hasan, learned AGA says that final order dated 26.07.2025 has been passed in the case in issue by the competent authority i.e. Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sidhauli, District- Sitapur. A copy of the order dated 26.07.2025 placed before this Court is taken on record. 4. In view of the aforesaid, this Court is of the view that the instant petition has now become infructuous. It is accordingly dismissed having become infructuous. It is however with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 26.07.2025, if law permits. November 12, 2025 Arun/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinay Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Govt. Advocate, Narendra Gupta, Pankaj Gupta (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Satish Kumar .....Petitioner(s) District Magistrate Sitapur And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench