RAM ADHAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P.THRU.SECY.COOP. CIVIL SECTT. LKO. and ORS.
WRIA/5425/2018 · 2025-11-04
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184522 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184522 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 5425 of 2018 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 4, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Umesh Singh, Sushil Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ashutosh Singh (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Ram Adhar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thru.Secy.Coop. Civil Sectt. Lko. And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench