- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24633 WP No. 7022 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 7022 OF 2025 (LA-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. SUBBEGOWDA, S/O LATE KALEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, SHIGARANAHALLI VILLAGE, HARIHARAPURA POST, HALEKOTE HOBLI, HOLENARASIPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT – 573 211. …PETITIONER (BY SRI RAJARAM SOORYAMBAIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF DEPUTY COMMISSONERS OFFICE BUILDING, HASSAN – 573 201. 2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, HASSAN, NEAR N.R.CIRCLE, HASSAN – 573 201. 3. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD-HASSAN, HASSAN DISTRICT – 573 201. 4. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD – HOLENARASIPURA, HASSAN DISTRICT – 573 211. Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24633 WP No. 7022 of 2025 5. PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, SHIGARANAHALLI VILLAGE, HARIHARAPURA POST, HALEKOTE HOBLI, HOLENARASIPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT – 573 211. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SESHU V., HCGP FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DTD 10.09.2024 FILED BY THE PETITIONER HEREIN VIDE ANNEXURE-A, AS EXPEDITIOUSLY AS POSSIBLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The petitioner is said to be owner of the land measuring 1,260 sq.ft which was notified for acquisition and only 150 sq.ft is said to have acquired. Representation is submitted seeking acquisition of the entire land as it has become of no use for the petitioner today. In that light, petitioner submitted a representation. The representation of the petitioner is yet to be considered though submitted on 10.09.2024. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24633 WP No. 7022 of 2025 2. In the light of the prayer being innocuous and the submission of the learned HCGP that the representation be considered on its merit, within a reasonable time, I deem it appropriate to dispose the petition with a direction to the respondent-State to consider the representation of the petitioner so submitted on 10.09.2024, in accordance with law, within an outer limit of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 3. It is made clear that this court has not pronounced upon the merit of the claim of the petitioner. With the aforesaid observations, petition is disposed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE CBC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12 CT:SS