ANIL KUMAR PATHAK v. NAND LAL GUPTA D.I.O.S. DISTT. AMETHI AND ANOTHER
CAPL/3092/2018 · 2025-12-01
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184514 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184514 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3092 of 2018 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
1. Case called out.
2. The present case is listed under the heading "These Matters be not adjourned".
3. A notice has been pasted outside the Court room prescribing that the matters listed under the heading "These Matters be not adjourned" shall not be revised and appropriate orders shall be passed in the first round itself.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant is neither present nor any request for the adjournment of the case has been made on his behalf.
5. In view of the above, the present contempt application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
6. Notice, if any, stands discharged. December 1, 2025 DiVYa Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Raj Kumar Pandey, Babban Prasad Shukla, Madhukar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Manish Kumar,J.) Anil Kumar Pathak .....Applicant(s) Nand Lal Gupta D.I.O.S. Distt. Amethi And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench