Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18450 (CHH)

BHUNESHWAR NAG v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2098/2022 · 2025-04-09

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:16732 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2098 of 2022 1 - Bhuneshwar Nag S/o Nandkumar Nag, Aged About 25 Years R/o Sidawand, Tehsil Keshkal, District Kondagaon, District : Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh 2 - Sanjay Nishad S/o Ramuram Nishad, Aged About 27 Years R/o Sidawand, Tehsil Keshkal, District Kondagaon, District : Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Panchayat And Gramin Vikas Vibhag, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector, Kondagaon, District : Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Keshkal, District : Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh 4 - Pratibha Vatti, W/o Ramesh Kumar Nag, Aged About 27 Years R/o. Sidawand, Tehsil Keshkal, District Kondagaon, District : Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Aditya Dhar Diwan, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate For State/Respondent No.1, 2 & 3 : Ms. Anuja Sharma, Panel Lawyer RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.04.11 20:35:11 +0530 2 For Respondent No.4 : Mr. Shobhit Koshta, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 09/04/2025 1. Heard Mr. Aditya Dhar Diwan, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Anuja Sharma, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No.1, 2 & 3 as well as Mr. Shobhit Koshta, learned counsel for the respondent No.4. 2. At the very outset, learned State counsel would submit that by efflux of time, the instant petition has rendered infructuous, to which the learned counsel for the petitioner has not objected. 3. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed being infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ravi Mandavi