HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10374 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Sri Jayant Pratap Singh, Advocate, has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No. 3 by filing his Vakalatnama, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for respondent no. 3. 3. This application has been filed mainly with the prayer to quash Chargesheet dated 26.02.2014, U/S 323, 504, 506, IPC against the Applicant herein with respect to FIR No. 382 of 2013 PS. Sahadatganj, District Lucknow as well as cognizance order 27.08.2015 as well as summoning order dated 02.11.2015 pending before the court of A.T.S Lucknow (State well of U.P v. Ajay Verma and Ors.), so far as the same relate to the applicant. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which is said to have taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as ANNEXURE NO. 6 to the application. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the parties concerned to appear before the trial court concerned within 2 weeks from today alongwith original compromise and the trial court is directed to verify the compromise within next 6 weeks. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Priyanka Singh, Abhay Pratap Singh, Abhilasha Rastogi, Akriti Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mr. Sumit Verma And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) 7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of three months, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. 9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if it has been filed, to the learned counsel for the applicant, after taking the photocopy of the same. December 16, 2025 A.Nigam A482 No. 10374 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench