HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 140 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. November 10, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Kewal Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Manoj Kumar Mani Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thru Secy.Secondary Edu.Govt.Of Up Lko. And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench