MUNSHILAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO.
BAIL/2338/2025 · 2025-11-04
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184483 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184483 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2338 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State.
2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.514 of 2024 under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 105 BNS, P.S.- Ramgaon, District- Bahraich.
3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that only general allegations have been leveled on account of a pity dispute arrived at amongst the accused and the son of the informant which subsequently resulted in his death. It is argued that two co-accused with the same allegations has been enlarged on bail.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances and bail orders of the co- accused, nature of allegations, coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since 25.10.2024 and has no previous criminal antecedent, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant- Munshilal be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Lalu Prasad Bhatt, Shiv Bahadur Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Munshilal .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 4, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 2338 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench