W.P.(MD)No.2401 of 2024 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI Rev.Aplc(MD)No.129 of 2025 and CMP.No.11600 of 2025 K.Sivasakthi .. Review Applicant vs. 1.Sivagnanavel 2.Sivagami Sundari 3.Esakki 4.Nagaraja 5.The Managing Director, Go Digit General Insurance Company Limited, Thiru.V.K.Nagar, Industrial Estate, Guindy, Opposite to Jaya T.V., Chennai 620 029. 6. The Manager, Go Digit General Insurance Company Limited, No.75A, Trivananthapuram Road, Palayamkottai 627 002. … Respondents PRAYER: This Review Application is filed under Order 47, Rule 1 of C.P.C. read with Section 114 of C.P.C., to review the Judgment and decree dated 31.12.2024 of this Court made in CMA.(MD)No.1020 of 2023. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.2401 of 2024 For Applicant : Mrs.D.Selva Kumari For R1 to R4 : No Appearance For R5 & R6 : Mr.N.Shylappa Kalyan O R D E R The mother of the deceased Minor Gnanesh, who is arrayed as 5th respondent (K.Sivasakthi) has preferred this Review Application against the Judgment and Decree dated 31.12.2024 passed in CMA. (MD) No.1020 of 2023. 2. The parties are indicated herein as per their litigative status and ranking made before the Trial Court. 3. The 5th respondent had filed CMA.No.1020 of 2023 before this Court on the issue of apportionment of the compensation among the dependents of the deceased. 4. The Tribunal granted compensation for a sum of Rs.6,65,000/- with interest at the rate of 7.5% from the date of filing application and it was apportioned as follows:- 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.2401 of 2024 "For the grandparents - Rs.2,00,000/- each and for the 5th respondent - Rs.2,65,000/-." 5. The learned counsel for the review applicant would strenuously contend that she has been residing a few kilometers away from the claimants' residence. It was further putforth that her only son passed away and her husband is also no more. 6. Despite the receipt of notice, non represented the respondents no.1 to 4. 7. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents no.5 & 6 would submit that there is no arithametic error. Hence, he sought for dismissal of this review application. 8. Review applicant lost her only son in a road traffic accident that took place on 18.12.2020. In consideration of the above said details, it is concluded that the review applicant is entitled to a sum of Rs. 3,65,000/- out of Rs.6,65,000/- and the claimants no.1 and 2 are entitled to Rs.1,50,000/- each. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.2401 of 2024 R.KALAIMATHI, J., kkd 9. This Review Application is ordered accordingly. There is no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 27.11.2025 Index : Yes/No Speaking / Non-speaking order kkd Rev.Aplc(MD)No.129 of 2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis