- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC:46335 RSA No. 924 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 924 OF 2019 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: SRI. BHAVA NARAYANA SEVA SAMITHI, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VENKATARAMAIAH, ANEKAL TOWN, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT-562 106. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SUNIL KUMAR., ADVOCATE [ABSENT] AND: 1. SRI.LAKSHMINARAYANAPPA.G S/O LATE LAKSHMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESIDING AT SANTE BEEDI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT-562 106. 2. THE CHIEF OFFICER, MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, ANEKAL, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT-562 106. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIJAYAKRISHNA BHAT., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. ABHINAV.R., ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:46335 RSA No. 924 of 2019 THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS LISTED FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Though the case called twice, the appellant is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal was filed in the year 2019. Now we are in the month of November 2024. The appeal is pending from five years. As already noted above, though case called twice, the appellant is not represented. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 69