HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7029 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel for the State respondents and Sri Mohan Singh for the Gram Panchayat. 2. Present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution has been filed with following prayer:- "Direct the opposite party no.1 i.e. Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide the interim relief application pending in Revision No.0698/2025, computerized case No.C- 202504000000698 "Ram Suresh Vs. Gaon Sabha, under Section 333 of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act, relating to Village - Dhamapatti, Pargana Mijhaura, Tehsil Bhiti, District Ambedkar Nagar expeditiously within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble court, in the interest of justice." 3. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that in the appeal preferred by the petitioner no interim order has been passed on the application for interim relief while on the other hand interference is being caused by the respondents on the disputed property for which there is requirement for expeditious disposal of the interim relief application. He further submits that the respondents have been served. 4. Learned State counsel does not oppose the aforesaid prayer. 5. Accordingly, considering the aforesaid submissions the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to consider and decided the application for interim relief with expedition, say within six weeks from the date service has been effected on the respondents, in case there is no legal impediment. 6. In case, it is not possible to decide the same within the time prescribed Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Ram Suresh .....Petitioner(s) Addl. Commissioner Adminstration, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s) above, he shall decide the same within two weeks thereafter. 7. It is further provided that in case it is not possible to decide the application for interim relief the respondent No.1 shall consider passing ad interim injunction if a case is so made out. . December 5, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 7029 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench