Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 184462 (ALL)

SUBHAM DUBEY v. MANAGING DIRECTOR MADHYANCHAL VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/14591/2025 · 2025-12-17

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14591 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 to 4, Mr. Brijendra Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.5 and perused the material on record. Instant petition has been filed seeking following reliefs:- "(i) to issue a writ order or direction in the the nature of certiorari, thereby quashing impugned order dated 12.3.2025 passed by the opposite party No. 6 under the dictate of the opposite party No. 3 contained as Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition. (ii) to issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari, thereby quashing the impugned letter dated 10.3.2025 passed by the opposite party No. 3 contained as Annexure No.2 to the writ petition. (iii) to issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite to parties restore the service of the petitioner and allow to pay him salary as and when the same falls due. (iv) to issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay the arrears of salary for the period in writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the circumstances of the case; and" Learned counsel for the petitioner, after argument at length, submits that the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pramod Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ran Vijay Singh, C.S.C. Subham Dubey .....Petitioner(s) Managing Director Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court is pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move fresh representation before the respondent no.2 within fifteen days and direct the respondent no.2 to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsels for the respondents have no objection to the submission aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to move fresh representation before the respondent no.2/Chief Engineer (Distribution) Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. Ayodhya, within fifteen days and in case such representation is moved, the respondent no.2 is directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within further period of six weeks. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. December 17, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 14591 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench